Forbes: 2012 “The Year of Cold Fusion?”
From Clayton Brown and Monica Long Ross of 137 Films: the story of those who believed in Cold Fusion, well worth supporting!
The topic is heating up! Forbes’s article wonders if 2012 will be the year of Cold Fusion. Our timing withThe Believers couldn’t be better.
The Believers begins in March of 1989, when two respected chemists from the University of Utah stand in front of a wall of reporters; flashbulbs pop as the pair — one shy, the other cracking jokes— announce a startling claim: they have solved the world’s energy problems using seawater, batteries, and the mysterious glass contraption they hold proudly in their hands. “Cold Fusion” is born. Within days, Stanley Pons and Martin Fleischmann are on the cover of Time Magazine. But in three short months, their careers are in tatters, their reputations ruined, and Cold Fusion is synonymous with “bad science.”
Twenty-two years later, despite mainstream science’s continued disdain, professional and amateur scientists, a high school whiz kid, and a Hollywood-based internet DJ are confident that Cold Fusion can still save the world, and that we are closer than ever to the Holy Grail of civilization. They’re the Believers.
Hear James Martinez on Cold Fusion Radio:
Monica Long Ross and Clayton Brown; Directors “The Believers” from 137Films
on the February 22, 2012 Ca$h Flow
Bill Wood, a/k/a-Bill BrockbraderBill Wood a/k/a Bill Brockbrader is now methodically unraveling some of the distortions that came from his initial public contact via the Project Camelot interviews. The subject of “mind control” is really at the core of all this reporting on Project Camelot and the various offshhoot threads…If you have not done so, please read Shootout At the Camelot Corral-Part 2: Mental Hate Crime for more on this subject.
Bill’s latest article: “Mind Control” (PDF)
The Mind Control Battlefield
While I grow weary of the subject of Project Camelot, I also think that regardless of where you come down in the battles there, it is instructive to see how the “MC” topic swirls through all of it. For those who insist that Camelot has done “good work” we would say “yes”…but is truth served by hidden agendas and a double-minded views of mind control? The issues of Kerry’s interview style aside, she also employs triggers in her methodology. You might call them manipulation…same thing. lesser degree.
This new release from Bill demonstrates how the usage of peer pressure, social engineering,and “logical reasoning” via SEAL, Steve Robinson in his posts to SEAL, Michael Jaco, who had posted that he recalled Brockbrader from SEAL BUD/s training (see the screen shots in the More Truth Revealed by Bill Brockbrader.pdf ). Even if you are not sure about Bill’s story, at least look at the effects of this social pressuring mechanism to unravel the man’s confidence—in a public (Facebook) forum. Understand that this is the initial phase of what is called “gang stalking“, and it occurs online, repeatedly, day after day. I know, I myself have been a victim of it many times on public forums, and it follows a very precise pattern.
Mind control (also known as brainwashing, coercive persuasion, mind abuse, thought control, or thought reform) refers to a process in which a group or individual “systematically uses unethically manipulative methods to persuade others to conform to the wishes of the manipulator(s)-Langone, Michael. “Cults: Questions and Answers”. www.csj.org. International Cultic Studies Association.
As Michael Jaco states in an email to Bill:
“I have never had any attacks against my character like I have when I came forward and said that I recognized you in training.”
Also telling is Micahel Jaco’s admission of how young girls are used to compromise SEALS (and this ties into other MKUltra-style operations, such as Monarch, which train young girls to be triggered into advancing sexual favors to “targets”—understand that this a very well used means of COMPROMISING people for later control, if they fall out of the control grid) with compromised sexual interactions. Jacko also indicates that his “Hell Week” log had been removed from the records.
Something that needs to be clarified is the usage of the term, “pedophile” in regards to Bill’s sex offender record. A pedophile is a repeated offender of young children…not a one time fling with planted “jailbait”. If, as Bill claims, the girl in question was 15 years old (while he was at the time, 25 years old) this does not even stand as a statutory rape offense in California. The Navy may have different standards, but the NCIS investigation records are apparently sealed to public scrutiny. That the military has long “winked” at the sexual practices of its ranks is not news, but the particulars of these incidents are now becoming the focus of increasing interest:
Lawsuit alleges tolerance for rape, sex abuse in military
By Bill Sizemore
© November 14, 2011
A member of a Navy SEAL support team says she was raped and that her superior dismissed her accusations and degraded her. His response was deemed “an isolated lapse in judgment,” but some say sexual discrimination and harassment are not unheard of in the support unit.
Again, understand that COMPROMISE is the most valuable tool for containing rogue elements, manipulating operatives in military, intelligence, diplomatic corps.; politicians, businessmen, and heads of state. This was a key element of the Artichoke, Monarch, and MKULtra programs:
“Can we get control of an individual to the point where he will do our bidding against his will and even against fundamental laws of nature, such as self-preservation?” -Memo on Project Artichoke, 1952 (Wikipedia)
The Camelot Juggernaut Unravels
The third area which Brockbrader covers in his PDF file is that of—Project Camelot. First, let me say here that Bill is very much of the mind that David Wilcock is straight up in terms of trust and integrity from his view. He has expressed this to me personally in a phone session we had, and again in this article—I will take him on his word and extend the umbrella of trust to David (despite some other questions I have about other incidents):
“Before my first interview, I provided Kerry with an abundance of evidence about my story that I only released to her. Pieces of that information were outed even before my second interview by Don Shipley and the private investigation company via Dennis H. Chevalier. That outing is the event that mandated that I flee to a safe location. A location that Kerry was never able to discover and the only thing that keeps me safe to this day. I would also like to point out that David Wilcock does know the location where Im staying and that my location has not been compromised to date. I believe I owe it to David to speak to his character in regards to my personal experiences with his honesty and integrity.”
And here is where it all gets INTERESTING: on the surface level, it seems that Kerry Cassidy was not honorable is maintaining confidence relative to Bill’s safety!
“Right before the third interview, I was advised not to do the interview as it was discovered that Kerry was going to use it as an opportunity to attempt to get me to violate my confidentiality agreement giving the military a firm legal ground to arrest me on. It was after the third interview that I informed Kerry that I possessed critical information about who was leaking information about me. What everyone has witnessed since that time is her reaction that I possessed the truth.” (Emphasis added—again, see my article: Shootout At the Camelot Corral-Part 2: Mental Hate Crime, which details Cassidy’s response.
Recall what I wrote above about MIND CONTROL: coercive persuasion, mind abuse, thought control, or thought reform—those terms are key to understanding the subtle, and not so subtle manipulations that weave through the various narratives of Kerry Cassidy’s workings. Also recall that back in December, I went after Richard C. Hoagland about his attacks on Gary Legierre, a/k/a “Gary The Mad Martian”…and Kerry’s incredibly cruel statements about Gary on her blog at Camelot—comments unsolicited, and outside the scope of interest (except personal) of Camelot at the time. Remember this…it plays into the next level of lifting the veil on Project Camelot:
“Let me now lay out the evidence as I see it so that others may take a look and make their own determinations. First of all, there was talk of a person named John Jack Burns and he being someone that led to the changes at Camelot between Bill and Kerry.”
in the PDF, Bill shows us “Jack” Burns’ Facebook page which, as Bill points out that “…that NASA appears prominently in the category of interests.” Kerry Cassidy is listed as a long time “friend” (in the Facebook sense) to Jack Burns. But more intriguingly, Bill pulls yet another “thread” that bears noticing:
“So let’s see if we can connect some dots. The following is a link to a NASA Astronaut named Christopher J. Cassidy.
I will point out that he was a former navy SEAL and possesses the same last name as Kerry. Quarky. Also it seems that both Kerry and Jack Burns possess some possible link to NASA as well as the Navy SEALs.” (I will add here that the relationship between Kerry and Cmdr. Christopher Cassidy is, at best tenuous, at this point—perhaps the coincidence of a common surname?)
Follow The Money?
Finally, of interest to the subject, Bill points to another interesting aspect of Project Camelot that goes relatively unexamined:
I also made a sizable donation to Project Camelot after the third interview for the donations that I received from my one dollar campaign and I let some of my ‘friends’ follow the money. Im not going to state any conclusions here but I do feel able to point out some obvious points to everyone. Project Camelot has not been maintaining its viewership as it once had.
Evidence of that can be seen on the view counters of the interview that have been coming out for the last year on Youtube. It is obvious that my interviews havebeen very good for her business and I would assume that I was not the only person to make a sizable donation to her recently. I will also point out that Kerry has announced that she is redesigning her website and that the ‘articles’ tab has disappeared from her site. I would like to be the first to congratulate her getting funds to redesign her site and I appreciate that the hateful article that she posted on her site about me has been removed.
Tying Some Loose Ends Together
Long before the Bill Wood interviews were ever aired, I had begun digging into the connections between Project Camelot and, specifically, NASA. Recall, that Kerry has long been a prominent supporter of Richard C. Hoagland. Even when Hoagland was talking ludicrous, incredible things about Elenin and then YU-55, Cassidy was avidly championing Hoagland on Camelot video interviews, and spotlighting him at the September, 2011 “Awake and Aware Conference”.
Recall, also, that while Hoagland appears to dish on NASA, I am not the first person to question his status as “Ex-NASA” (see “The Cult of NASA and the Hoagland Factor”). In fact, it has been stated on several occassions that it appears Hoagland serves as a sort of “misdirect” foil for NASA, by creating web memes to throw off the trail via clever meme fabrications (a/k/a “The Face On Mars”)—obscuring more critcal information by cleverly focusing on one thing…while averting any notice of the REAL thing. This goes, as well, to the core of the disagreement between former Project Pegasus member, Andrew Basiago and Hoagland (see Project Pegasus and Life On Mars with Andrew Basiago)…Hoagland creates a diversion from the point that Mars has indigenous humanoid life.
In his article, “Do the Owls want to shut down Richard C. Hoagland?” (January 2004), John C. Haich presented the case that Richard Hoagland was, and still is, connected to NASA and to the Center for Security Policy, headed by Neo-Con, Frank Gaffney. So much for being this maverick agency critic!
Hoagland is also fond of citing his work with Walter Cronkite on the coverage for CBS of the Apollo Program. Given the understanding that the Apollo program was scripted (Apollo 11, notably) for public consumption to mask the presence of teams already on not just the Moon, but Mars (again, see Andrew Basiago’s revelations and his quote from his challenge to Hoagland where he states:
“Kerry Cassidy of Project Camelot has informed me that you are part of a faction − one that includes Clark McClelland − that has known that Mars is inhabited but has kept this information secret so that it might be disclosed at a later time.”)
It is long held that “Uncle Walter” was, in fact, a CIA operative (see “Walter Cronkite and the CIA”). Was Richard Hoagland’s career built on his service to intelligence agency media disinformation?
Where does Richard Hoagland intersect with Project Camelot? Given that the history of Project Camelot has been “sanitized”—some early videos apparently removed from the web—and we know only what the “official” bios have told us about the inception of the project; we have to fill in the dots as best we can. One interesting piece of history comes from David Wilcock via his website bio:
Some time around 2003:
“David was also tasked by Richard C. Hoagland to upgrade his interplanetary climate change research to a whole new level, and this necessitated a relieving end to the basement labor by the beginning of April. Up until the Hoagland initiative, David had relied heavily on the work of Russian Dr. Aleskey Dmitriev’s studies to argue that our entire solar system was rapidly becoming brighter, hotter and more energetic. Hoagland insisted that all Russian data needed to be thrown out for the purposes of skeptical Western scientists, and every point needed to be argued from a direct NASA study.
David generated well over a foot of new Internet research books in just a few months as a result of this inspiration, which led to the 2004 “Interplanetary Day After Tomorrow?” article series on Richard’s website, enterprisemission.com, and an appearance on the Art Bell show with Richard, followed by an appearance at the Bay Area UFO Expo later that same year.”
We also learn of the fortunate connections David Wilcock made at a Hoagland conference in 2005:
David first met Billy Blake in February 2005 after a conference at a Science of Mind center in Pasadena on Valentine’s Day. The contacts David made at the Hoagland conference, particularly through Robert Perala, led to this opportunity. Billy was awed by David’s presentation and said that if it were turned into a film, it would be incredible. Thus, the CONVERGENCE film project was born – the realization of the gold-medal prophecy.
So, we can connect Richard Hoagland to David Wilcock as early as 2004. In 2005, Wilcock is moving into Hollywood circles…2006 is around the time Cassidy and Ryan form their partnership. . So here we can only speculate: could the “convergences” which produced the cozy relationships between Camelot, Richard Hoagland and David Wilcock have been forged in a manner designed to create an intel-style “pressure valve” for the burgeoning internet interest into conspiracy theory? We will hold David Wilcock to the side on this…for now, but there are clear linkages between Cassidy and Hoagland that seem to be beyond the normal “business” of Whistleblowers and disclosure.
Given Hoagland’s past work, and the linkages between major media outlets (CBS), NASA, and Frank Gaffney, an apologist for the right wing war policies of the Bush administration in Iraq (Gaffney on Hard Ball with Chris Matthews stated: ” (“…The threat we did know about was the chemical capability that Saddam Hussein had used against his own people. The potential for biological agents were real there was evidence that there was an ongoing nuclear program… The danger was inaction could have resulted in the death[s] of a great many more Americans than 4,000 and that’s the reason I’m still delighted that we did what we did.”), can we not see a valid pattern for exploiting the deep underground culture of the emerging web and the interest in “alternative media”?
Given the connections between Cassidy (Bill Ryan is no longer a viable element of Project Camelot), Richard Hoagland, tangentially, David Wilcock, and more importantly, Jack Burns, we now have a few more pieces of a puzzle…is this a “project” that has been played by “them”…knowingly, or unknowingly, by the principles? Is the whole “alternative media” merely window dressing for a honeypot operation that pulls in viewers to splinter perceptions? Did Project Camelot simply go “off the rails” with the departure of Bill Ryan (and the insertion of Jack Burns)? Or is it simply a victim of the big, beautiful media messs that is the internet in 2012?
Not an optimistic article, but some great insights and advice.
From: Veterans Today Military & Foreign Affairs Journal by Stephen Lendman
Money power rules. Across Europe and America, governments follow banker diktats. They demand economies and people suffer to assure they’re paid.
Whatever’s finally enacted, expect poverty levels to rise. Already, around half of US households earn below subsistence incomes or border it, according to US Census figures. New cuts will push many more over the line to greater hunger, homelessness and despair.
Obama, most congressional Democrats, and Republicans serve America’s aristocracy at the expense of popular needs gone begging.
Planned cuts will force greater than ever burdens on households struggling to get by. As a result, the worst’s yet to come.
Forewarned is forearmed. The mother of all struggle’s needed to change things. It requires activism, not wishing, to get results.
People mean well, and I get that. The media stimulation creates a vortex of thoughts that stream and oscillate until we doubt what we see, hear and think. I get that. Out of respect, I have not posted the writer’s identity, nor is this intended to impugn him…he is someone who keeps me honest. Because I spent the time answering, as sincerely as I can, I felt it proper to share my thoughts following this email:
Name and Email Witheld
Subject: David Wilcock
You have been critical of David Wilcock and my personal time-line was that I first heard of this on Coast to Coast and then I heard your take on the Wilcock/Fulford interview where you made fun of him so I never heard the original interview so I sided with your speculation that David had done some shenenigans.
Today I finally got around to hearing the actual interview that David did with Ben and right now I am listening to David falling apart on the night he was threatened. His distress rings true for me. I belive he is under extreme distress in the phone call with Carey Cassidy of Project Camelot.
If Wilcock is acting I admit that he has fooled me with this performance. Here is the link:
Please give the above a listen and then go back and listen to the Wilcock/Fufford interview.
You can decide for yourself whether or not David Wilcock was threatened. I for one do believe he was threatened. You can also decide whether or not Fulford is lying with his story which caused the distress.
Also I am well aware that when the PTBs have a beef with a public persona and if they can’t threaten or buy them off that they character assassinate them with people they own or with people who act as Stooges who do their bidding.
I have a question for you and I’ll be blunt. are you being paid off by someone to sublimate Wilcock? (Emphasis added)
If are not being paid off then you may want to vet your sources on anyone coming forward at this time on this issue with Wilcock.
I admit my mistake in not bothering to listen to the original interview and I had no idea that the interview with Cassidy existed till this moment.
Camelot has made mistakes, I’m sure Wilcock has made mistakes. I would bet that you may have even made mistakes and Ithink you have mistakenly smeared Wilcock on this issue.
If you do listen to this interview and find that you may have made a mistake about Wilcock then I would appreaciate it if you to address your audience if you so choose and relay to them that you could have been mistaken about your speculation with David Wilock’s interview with Benjamin Fulford. If you are certain he is lying then you owe nothing and probably have not bothered to read this e-mail.
Thank you for your time Randy.
My remarks below—and I do drop some points I cannot substantiate. I will be ever so pleased to retract, with great humility, anything I am in error about. My “opponents” at Camelot drop “factoids” all the time without documentation or ascribing sources, so I level the field by saying: “You have your sources, I have mine”:
|Saturday February 15, 20102 7:48 PM
You may be my most honest reader/listener!
I am deeply flattered that you could front the notion I am paid to do this—given the puny audience I have vs. Project Camelot. But thanks! I still work a regular job and drive a 9 year old auto.
I listened to the Wilcock-Fulford audios when they were released. I read the particulars of the $Trillion Lawsuit and the endless verbiage that David spent his days compiling. Yes, I heard the famous Camelot interview where David is threatened and breaks down. One question:
In that interview with Cassidy and David, there was a third person. An Aussie accent, who was called “Anonymous”. We were told that Anon was David’s protector. But no one on the show would admit WHO “Anonymous” was. Well, I know who he is, and he is NOT “Anonymous”, his first name is Jack and he is an intelligence operative from Pine Gap Australia, who is (or appears to be) Kerry Cassidy’s handler!
So, if David’s intentions are pure, and Kerry is not playing the emotions of the audience, then Jack should have been introduced properly. Truth is, I still think it was all contrived; I am unconvinced that any of this hoopla over the White Dragons and White Hats (and white undies) is anything more than a gigantic stooge play to keep the “community” off balance and distracted. At the least, the audience should have been told who Jack is…because David and Kerry both know who he is, and what he does.
Yes, you should have listened to the audios if you care so much. No, you should not take my word for anything, and I could be wrong about many details because I cannot prove everything—yet. My question is this: at the core of all this drama, what does a $Trillion Lawsuit and gold in the Philippines mean to you?
Assuming this lawsuit is ever heard, will it result in a reform of the global money system? Remember whose courts these documents must pass through. People with that much wealth pay judges. Assuming all this gold is recovered (and the gold story is true, buy the way), I hope you have dumped your gold investments well ahead because the price of gold will tank!
Assuming that Fulford’s White Dragons are not just another layer of deception, do you think they care about the exploitative practices of the American banking system; the IRS; the World Ban and IMF? And can they really stare down the gun barrels of the troops aligned across the Middle East? Does ANY of this, at the end of the day, really prosper you and your family and bring “peace and prosperity”? Look, this type of stuff has been around for over a decade—go look u[p NESARA.
These are the questions I can’t ask David Wilcock because HE doesn’t answer email from “puny” websites like mine. Kerry Cassidy won’t answer these questions whilst looking down her nose at the “rabble” who feed her ego and bank account. It might be that Ben would…he seems the one guy in all this that is actually human. Maybe I am all wrong.
I have spent months reading the daily dispatches—from Wilcock, and a half dozen “Galactic Federation” type off world councils—ALL claiming that any moment now the Bush-Rothschild-Kissinger cabal will be rounded up and jailed…that a new currency is in the making…that humanity is “ascending” into a nerw consciousness, and yet all the while this insanity grows wilder and wilder. WTF?
I have NO idea what David Wilcock’s agenda is. He has jumped merrily from subject to subject—from interplanetary climate change to CONVERGANCE, to this investigation into the global economic system. His book, “The Source Field Investigation” is a wonderful piece of research, but most of it is information already published, just regurgitated through Wilcock’s world view. At best, he is a dilletente who may have found his “voice”…as he virally re-blogged through the meme machine of like-minded bloggers.
So…based on the best evidence, what do YOU think, my friend? Because that is what matters. If I am wrong about David Wilcock I doubt he will care since I doubt he is but vaguely aware of me. Kerry is VERY aware of me because I have been up her ass for several months. Jack is in Australia, so I doubt he is hanging around David’s house with a Glock…though he does fly in to MALIBU to visit Kerry at her beach house (pricey place to live for a “guerrilla journalist”, eh?)
Humanity needs to wake up and stop following media divas off the cliff. If you learn from David Wilcock, then follow his teachings and own your awakening; use your higher self to determine truth, and understand that while WIlcock claims he is the reincarnation of Edgar Cayce, he is not the reincarnation of Christ.
I appreciate your comments, and I see your sincerity, but I would like more than just feeling bad to back down from my gut feeling that this is all a gigantic charade. Hey, maybe ET does come down and set us free from our global masters….maybe we get lemon drops and lollipops to boot.