Always one to be convinced that she delivers the definitive “take” on events outside her control…Kerry Cassidy weighed in on Drake and “The Plan”. Cassidy, who is considered by some to be one of the more thorough researchers on the net, when in fact, has a very narrow focus based on her own (or those of her own “cartel’s”) agenda and worldview. In the audio clip below, and her subsequent blog post, she thoroughly spins the entire Drake interview into a few concise nuggets gleaned from her out-of-focus, ripped from context manner. It would also appear that Cassidy and David Wilcock have seperated paths…at least as far as Drake is concerned.
Kerry’s blog post from April 13 or 14 (hard to tell as there are no date stamps):
THE REVOLUTION WILL NOT BE TELEVISED – Updated
Keep this in mind when Drake tells you to stay home and turn on your TV and wait for further “instructions”….
click here for the Gil Scott Heron rendition of his poem-song “The Revolution Will Not Be Televised”. He was the originator of the phrase. Now given that the references are dated and this is not just for ‘black people’ but for all people this time around… It is a revolution of consciousness.
Why do I say that for those not understanding what “The Revolution Will Not Be Televised” MEANS… it means it will be LIVE and it will not be something “handled” by the men with guns on your behalf. To bring this concept up to the present day … the point is if you want change you must first change yourself and then take action.
What I object to in Drake’s original interview with David Wilcock is the paternalistic tone and telling people to lock their doors stay inside and turn on their TV and wait for further instructions and re-education.
This is a revolution by and for the people and must be orchestrated from within. It will not happen on one day and it will not be sold to you along with conventional media spin or products to get you through the night. It will require you to turn on, tune in and take part.
THE REVOLUTION WILL NOT BE TELEVISED – UpdatedKeep this in mind when Drake tells you to stay home and turn on your TV and wait for further “instructions”…. click here for the Gil Scott Heron rendition of his poem-song “The Revolution Will Not Be Televised”. He was the originator of the phrase. Now given that the references are dated and this is not just for ‘black people’ but for all people this time around… It is a revolution of consciousness.Why do I say that for those not understanding what “The Revolution Will Not Be Televised” MEANS… it means it will be LIVE and it will not be something “handled” by the men with guns on your behalf. To bring this concept up to the present day … the point is if you want change you must first change yourself and then take action. What I object to in Drake’s original interview with David Wilcock is the paternalistic tone and telling people to lock their doors stay inside and turn on their TV and wait for further instructions and re-education. This is a revolution by and for the people and must be orchestrated from within. It will not happen on one day and it will not be sold to you along with conventional media spin or products to get you through the night. It will require you to turn on, tune in and take part.
I did not have time to review this clip prior to my Drake interview, but had read her blog post. People who listen carefully to the interview, and to Drake’s replies will have many of the “issues” raised by Cassidy answered. Here are a few points of difference worth addressing:
Cassidy asserts that the plan as outlined by Drake “is in all intents and purposes a coup..”
A big push right now…a huge desire to paint a picture…that we are going into a golden age…putting on blinders…they can then make that happen.” She terms this an “Illuminati philosophy”. She then blathers on about creators and announces that creation “without a spirit is dead…robotic…a Project Blue Beam kinda thing..and you can be taken over.”
She also talks about knowing Drake and his group, and where he comes from..”what is it their intentions really are when they talk about sitting in your home and just allowing this changing of the guard to occur…a paternalistic approach.”
Cassidy intones a “revolution in consciousness” and an energy shift…
She then goes to the remarks made by Drake and Wilcock about “killing off the perpetrators of the NWO”…”vengence and blood” and “the Illuminati track”.
Answering Cassidy’s points:
From a strictly linguistic view, “The Plan” is, in fact, a coup which, according to Merriam-Webster’s Dictionary, is a “OVERTURN, an UPSET”. What Cassidy infers is that a coup is necessarily violent in nature (coup de grace) or an insurrection (coup d’etat) that overturns a LEGITIMATE authority. Rhetorically, she twists the word to fit her particular bias, and inserts a negative context. The following points negate and refute Cassidy’s statement:
Based upon Drake’s original interview with David Wilcock (transcript here),in the subsequent interviews (posted here), and in the latest interview which I conducted, it is very clear that the initiation of this process is derived from a lawful, peaceful process which re-aserts the original foundations of the United States (not UNITED STATES)via the founding documents.
That present and former military operatives, inside the Pentagon, as well as insiders in the government, intelligence agencies, financial, and legal institutions, who are of a higher moral conscience, have long felt that the nation had gone terminally rougue from its founding principles; and that plans have been in formation for decades to eventually move against the military-industrial-intellignece-banking-corporate cartel that had take power over the U.S. and the globe; demonstrates an internal expression of the national will to retain a free, accountable, and transparent government, based on founding principles.
That the legitimate military officers, non-commissioned, and enlisted troops operate under the authority of their oaths, the UCMJ, and the procedures outlined in the Armed Services Field Manuals; and that defending the nation against “enemies foreign and domestic”, is a prime directive. The military,in this capacity, therefore operates under a de jure mandate that is neither martial law or insurrection; nor does it violate the Posse Comitatus Act of 1807.
Terming “The Plan”, outlined by Drake, as a “coup”, is based on Cassidy’s biased speculation, and is a statement of sheer sophistry; an out-of-context distortion of the intents, as outlined repeaterdly (listen to Drake’s 03-17-2012, “Address To The Troops“). Such inference by Cassidy, simply lends false credibility to the fiction of legitimacy perpetrated by the present cabal-led faction of foreign bankers and murderers who wreak mayhem over the planet. You need to ask: WHO does Kerry Cassidy REALLY speak for?
While Drake communicates the desire for an orderly series of events to occur, and is optimistic that The Plan can be accomplished with minimal interruption, no thinking person can believe this process will be painless or without pitfalls under the best circumstances. The men and women behind the scenes are VERY cognizant of the serious nature of the proceedings, and are grounded in a sober respect for the spiritual roots of such actions.
Drake has repeatedly outlined steps that can be taken by EVERYONE to help assure a peaceful transition, and he has also stated that people MUST be proactive, involved, vigilant, and ready to withstand temporary (not defined) hardships. While he may be a bit “homey” in his narrative, he is also grounded in the realism of a boots-on-the-ground soldier who has experienced the horrors of war. Again, we advise actually READING/LISTENING…IN CONTEXT…the full outline. ANd also THINKING TROUGH what may be involved in a perilous undertaking!
The “Illuminati philosophy” is, was, and always will be an INVERSION of true spirtual principles—even the term, “illumined” is a dark appropriation of genuine spiritual truths. Used, as it is, in the context of Cassidy’s narrative in the audio, it is simply another device to distort the intent and moral character of the people behind “The Plan”. As usual with Kerry, she injects buzz words and dangles dark phrases like “Blue Beam” to instill the fear memes she has spent years spinning and looping out into the infosphere. Her assertion that “without a spirit” (this) would be a “dead creation” is likewise more of her rhetorical twisting of what is actually outlined.
IF Kerry actually “knows the people behind this movement”, as she states: WHY ARE THEY NOT TALKING TO HER? Certainly, Project Camelot still has significant enough page view numbers (for now…) to make it one of the more desirable places to air an honest interview with Drake…she may tell you she is not interested…or is it the opposite? What does that infer?
She further implies that “Drake and his group” are a mechanism to ensnare, blind, and “take away the power” of the people of the U.S.—she is very deft at the veiled inferences…but, herself steadfastly resists giving up her own positions on where SHE stands. Drake has outlined (again) positive actions that the people will need to initiate through the process. He is circumspect in cautioning agaisnt ENGAGING any military, but also adamant that the military WILL act in accordance with their field manuals regarding the civilian population.
It is, admittedly, one of the more “dicey” issues involved in this undertaking, that: both the military are acting lawfully, AND that the populace are properly informed about the action—and it is of genuine concern. But using fear imagery and veiled assaults on the honor of those involves does not serve the legitimate issues in such a grave endeavor. (Addressed as well in my interview)
Fixing on a single (again out-of-context) statement made by Drake and re-fashioning it as: “sitting in your home and just allowing this changing of the guard to occur…” is a classic tar baby wielded by Cassidy to infer that a passive stance is being promoted by Drake et al, and is is a nearly complete fabrication. Passivity and blind obedience to authority is the opposite spirit of the one outlined by Drake in all of presentations.
The “revolution in consciousness” and an energy shift…” cited by Cassidy (in her rambling narrative)IS the issue at hand! Again…this has been addressed by MANY, including David Wilcock, Ben Fulford, as well asJames Martinez (in two interviews here )and nearly all of my guests. It is THE guiding principle behind the TIMING of this execution, which has been in formation for over a decade. While vortexes and tunneling energy waves are all very cool, consciousness change manifests in the WILL and DESIRE of people to change…the interest in what Drake has talked about is significant enough to warrant being a “game changer”.
Regarding the statements made about “..killing off the perpetrators of the NWO”…“vengence and blood”…Drake has made concise philosophical remarks that must be taken fully in the CONTEXT (big, big requirement) of possible scenarios”:
It is David Wilcock who states: “If someone has done massive, massive harm to others — and that includes torturing people, killing people in large numbers, doing it with a sadistic glee and with people who are innocent — then we, as a society, do have the right to issue a death penalty.”(from MASS ARRESTS: David Interviews Drake — Transcript!)
It is also fair to state that Drake does insert his own values into his talks…as does David Wilcock, and many others in the dialog about this plan. The public discussion is going RIGHT NOW!, on YouTube, websites, blogs, and radio shows. It is total hyperbole to fashion Drake, and the people behind “The Plan” as mindless agents of vendetta, and it was David Wilcock who noted this in the interview by stating:
“I think that people have a right to a trial by jury. I think that doing a bunch of shooting at the beginning is a terrible mistake. It makes us no better than the people that we’re attempting to supersede.”
Kerry Cassidy is NOT part of this discussion. In her present role she is little more than agent provocatuer in service to her own personal and media bias, and employs distortion where a level, journalistic tone would better serve. Shading the process of a people trying to organize a liberation effort as “the Illuminati track” should tell us all we need to know about Kerry Cassidy’s integrity in presenting facts—AND give clues as to where she actually does stand in any proactive movements that convey a true “consciousness shift”.
Anyone who reads this blog knows that I have tried to balance my skepticism of “The Plan” with an intent to check out facts and intention; and corellate data from both the inside, and external indicators of what can be callled a “movement” in formation. Humanity is both tragically flawed, and ingenously resilliant, and any movement is fraught with peril.
Besides restoring the United States to a LAWFUL government, consider: disclosure of all “black projects”, suppressed technologies, Satanic Ritual Abuse cults, pedophile rings, and the massive financial plunder—worldwide–as well as the disclosure and end to the MKUltra-style mind control programs, sexual rings, and Blackwater-type mercenaries that have tarnished the U.S. military’s image!
Being a media “drama queen” for her own brand of exotic, mystical mumbo jumbo and para-politcs is Kerry Cassidy’s specialty…not assessing the merits of a serious discussion of a framework that has potential to end the tragic cycles of war, death, and poverty which have inflicted for millenia upon mankind. Our odds are narrow. We need truth and deep introspection…not more hubristic, shallow opinions from a non-journalist.
(Aside: I have been privy to the INTERNATIONAL media interest in interviewing Drake, and of other nations who are seeking help for similar efforts—GLOBALLY. Drake is about to penetrate more mainstream media venues in the very near term. It is apparent that this movement has some real “legs“…more on that soon)
As is heard in the opening minutes of my interview with Drake, I had strongly requested that the States Documents which were filed with the World Court be released for public inspection as an initial sign of some solid proof of due diligence. In conversations with my contacts, I had indicated that this type of proof would go a long way towards providing some assurrance that this was not all a “smoke and mirrors” media ruse. What I wish we could all see is the proof of service and certification of receipt by the clerk at the Hague, but for now, this goes a long way towards providing researchers with the pro forma basis for a legitimate action.
Naturally, cynics and scoffers will not be satisfied, nor is the presentation of any such documents conclusive proof of action, but I do feel that by releasing the redacted copy of the notarized original Pennsylvania Apostile that we now have a basis to assess the legal basis of the action, and some tangible evidence for the claims made by Drake in his interviews. I continue to press for more evidence to be released as the conditions allow, bearing in mind that it is likely people HAVE placed lives and fortunes on the line to initiate this process.
Patience, prudence, diligence, and discernment will all go along way in de-coding the information being presented. Clearly, Drake and his associates HAVE created a major meme on the internet. provoked much controversy and thought, as well as a fair amount of criticism. Persoanlly, I remain, in the best sense, a SKEPTIC:
from Greek skeptikos, from skeptikos thoughtful, from skeptesthai to look, consider
1 : an adherent or advocate of skepticism
2 : a person disposed to skepticism especially regarding religion or religious principles
I also have sources who provide information to me in a way that is “coded”, so to speak, and there are many “puzzle pieces” that I have been processing which indicate that Drake is speaking for a very powerful group of present and former military, white hat financial, and government insiders to initiate “The Plan”. No one person or group has all the information. This is a multi-lateral approach birthed out of common interests and linked through etworks forged over many decades.
Look around you…pay attention to details. Ignore mainstream news and examine carefully “coded” communications. IF and WHEN the day comes that this “Plan” is initiated, the whole world WILL be watching. Also, understand that unless people are willing to risk…no liberation from this monstrous cabal is ever possible.
ETs/EDs Involved In The “Plan” “Drake’s” Talking About–Paying Off A Karmic Debt
ETs/EDs who owe humankind a great karmic debt are apparently an integral part of “The Plan” being publicly discussed by “Drake” and widely reported on the Internet. ETs/EDs’ involvementmay explain how the security lid has been kept on–for decades–on a secret supposedly now known by 90% percent of the Pentagon officers, yet unknown to the writer’s highly cleared contacts.
ETs/EDs and ground units are protecting “Drake,” whose frenetic networking activities would seem to make him the world’s easiest surveillance/assassination target. Should that protection fail, the ETs/EDs have said that if he’s killed, “Pearl Harbor” files will be released which will destroy the NWO (New World Order) Cabal, but either way, the Cabal is “screwed” and doomed to destruction. Should any Cabal members attempt to flee once the planned major arrests begin, the ETs/EDs can and will blow their planes and helicopters out of the sky and vessels out of the water. As was plainly stated before: “Nowhere to run, nowhere to hide!” The ETs/EDs are also well aware that Bahama Island is a planned Cabal refuge and have big plans for it. Ruinous ones! The ETs/EDs know of similar hidey holes elsewhere, too.
This is not a drill – the Russian Stock Market has closed indefinitely, and reports are that the Russian Government has declared it an Emergency. In other news, the entire cabinet of The Netherlands resigned this morning because they could not come to an accord over budget and austerity issues…
The title of the article may be a bit disingenuous…what is called news in the west is largely hindsight for people who actually PAY ATTENTION. That said, all this was talked about in the Between Worlds-The Duncan and Miranda Tapes, February 26, 2012 interview…we are about to witness an onslaught of drones in the North America Empire (yes, it is one power that rules over the continent from Canada down to the tip of Argentina…duuuhhh!)
This article from RT.com can be taken as confirmation of this insidious use of tech for purposes of POLICING the peoples of the NA Empire—and not JUST policing, either, just follow this link: Police drones to be equipped with non-lethal weapons? (hint: “non-lethal” is a clever semantic term for “soft kill”—think TASERs on steroids…)
Non-military agencies have been gearing up to get unmanned drones in the sky across America, and now it looks like those controversial aircraft will soon be heading north, as well.
Not only are surveillance drones expected to soar in droves across American airspace in the not-so-distant future, but now it has been confirmed that authorities in Canada have successfully followed through with test flights of the unmanned aircraft for their own use.
A spokesperson for CAE, Inc., which is located in Montreal, Quebec, Canada, has confirmed that a series of test flights have occurred in recent weeks as the country looks towards purchasing drones for domestic use. According to CAE’s vice president, Pietro D’Ulisse, the capabilities of the craft will be a great asset for law enforcement across Canada.
“Much like the use of simulation in training, the use of unmanned systems for a range of civil applications has the potential to enhance safety, increase efficiency, and save money. We look forward to continuing to work closely with Aeronautics, regulatory authorities, and potential customers as we demonstrate these capabilities,” D’Ulisse reports in a recent press release. (Emphasis added)
Parse the Orwelian double-speak:
“An asset for law enforcement”? You mean like “eye In the sky” 24/7 overhead reconnaissance; instant-on”sight and capture” of the misbehaving human assets? And WTF are “non-military agencies”? Yes, the police are now denominated as “agencies”, which means they also get to behave badly with regards to civil rights/Constitutional guarantees…and, oh yes, black budgets…you didn’t think that NDAA would go witout teeth did you?
It has been revealed in recent months that the US Department of Homeland Security has been operating an arsenal of similar unmanned surveillance crafts to keep close watch on America’s border with Mexico. On the horizon, however, are plans to expand that program domestically from coast-to-coast, authorizing smaller jurisdictions to operate spy missions by themselves in their own airspace. As the US considers furthering plans that will put added fleets of surveillance drones under the command of local law enforcement departments, though, Canada is also embarking in endeavors that will essentially put all of North America under watch from above.
Let me ask the question: do you REALLY think that the local boys who yuck it up at Tastee Creme and slap tickets on hapless speeders are really going be trusted to handle advanced technology maturely? The “local law enforcement” agencies are a front for a TOTAL global surveillance project pipelined to NSA, Interpol, Mossad, and every interconnected police, military and spy agency worldwide…WELCOME to Dystopia!
Draw your own conclusions in the final part of the article:
While Canada is only just getting ready to put drones in its airspace, the EFF has learned through a Freedom of Information Act request that the US has already granted dozens of small-time agencies and institutions approval to work with unmanned crafts.
In addition to the already-established permission for the US Department of Homeland Security to send drones into America’s airspace, the EFF learned in recent days that over 50 other institutions ranging from police departments to colleges have been authorized to use drones by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). Among those given permission to pursue drone operations include local law enforcement agencies in Arlington, Texas, Little Rock, Arkansas and Miami, Florida, as well as universities across the country in states such as Colorado, Connecticut and North Dakota.
Ryan Calo, a researcher at Stanford Law School, tells the Wall Street Journal that he expects more entities to seek approval as drones are retired from use overseas and they become more affordable for domestic use. Does that mean we should expect positive results, though, or concerns over privacy?
“The very same drone that was staking out a nest of insurgents and possibly shooting them could be deployed in New York for surveillance,” Calo tells the Journal.