Bill Wood a/k/a Bill Brockbrader is now methodically unraveling some of the distortions that came from his initial public contact via the Project Camelot interviews. The subject of “mind control” is really at the core of all this reporting on Project Camelot and the various offshhoot threads…If you have not done so, please read Shootout At the Camelot Corral-Part 2: Mental Hate Crime for more on this subject.
Bill’s latest article: “Mind Control” (PDF)
The Mind Control Battlefield
While I grow weary of the subject of Project Camelot, I also think that regardless of where you come down in the battles there, it is instructive to see how the “MC” topic swirls through all of it. For those who insist that Camelot has done “good work” we would say “yes”…but is truth served by hidden agendas and a double-minded views of mind control? The issues of Kerry’s interview style aside, she also employs triggers in her methodology. You might call them manipulation…same thing. lesser degree.
This new release from Bill demonstrates how the usage of peer pressure, social engineering,and “logical reasoning” via SEAL, Steve Robinson in his posts to SEAL, Michael Jaco, who had posted that he recalled Brockbrader from SEAL BUD/s training (see the screen shots in the More Truth Revealed by Bill Brockbrader.pdf ). Even if you are not sure about Bill’s story, at least look at the effects of this social pressuring mechanism to unravel the man’s confidence—in a public (Facebook) forum. Understand that this is the initial phase of what is called “gang stalking“, and it occurs online, repeatedly, day after day. I know, I myself have been a victim of it many times on public forums, and it follows a very precise pattern.
Mind control (also known as brainwashing, coercive persuasion, mind abuse, thought control, or thought reform) refers to a process in which a group or individual “systematically uses unethically manipulative methods to persuade others to conform to the wishes of the manipulator(s)-Langone, Michael. “Cults: Questions and Answers”. www.csj.org. International Cultic Studies Association.
As Michael Jaco states in an email to Bill:
“I have never had any attacks against my character like I have when I came forward and said that I recognized you in training.”
Also telling is Micahel Jaco’s admission of how young girls are used to compromise SEALS (and this ties into other MKUltra-style operations, such as Monarch, which train young girls to be triggered into advancing sexual favors to “targets”—understand that this a very well used means of COMPROMISING people for later control, if they fall out of the control grid) with compromised sexual interactions. Jacko also indicates that his “Hell Week” log had been removed from the records.
Something that needs to be clarified is the usage of the term, “pedophile” in regards to Bill’s sex offender record. A pedophile is a repeated offender of young children…not a one time fling with planted “jailbait”. If, as Bill claims, the girl in question was 15 years old (while he was at the time, 25 years old) this does not even stand as a statutory rape offense in California. The Navy may have different standards, but the NCIS investigation records are apparently sealed to public scrutiny. That the military has long “winked” at the sexual practices of its ranks is not news, but the particulars of these incidents are now becoming the focus of increasing interest:
By Bill Sizemore
© November 14, 2011A member of a Navy SEAL support team says she was raped and that her superior dismissed her accusations and degraded her. His response was deemed “an isolated lapse in judgment,” but some say sexual discrimination and harassment are not unheard of in the support unit.
“Can we get control of an individual to the point where he will do our bidding against his will and even against fundamental laws of nature, such as self-preservation?” -Memo on Project Artichoke, 1952 (Wikipedia)
The Camelot Juggernaut Unravels
The third area which Brockbrader covers in his PDF file is that of—Project Camelot. First, let me say here that Bill is very much of the mind that David Wilcock is straight up in terms of trust and integrity from his view. He has expressed this to me personally in a phone session we had, and again in this article—I will take him on his word and extend the umbrella of trust to David (despite some other questions I have about other incidents):
“Before my first interview, I provided Kerry with an abundance of evidence about my story that I only released to her. Pieces of that information were outed even before my second interview by Don Shipley and the private investigation company via Dennis H. Chevalier. That outing is the event that mandated that I flee to a safe location. A location that Kerry was never able to discover and the only thing that keeps me safe to this day. I would also like to point out that David Wilcock does know the location where Im staying and that my location has not been compromised to date. I believe I owe it to David to speak to his character in regards to my personal experiences with his honesty and integrity.”
And here is where it all gets INTERESTING: on the surface level, it seems that Kerry Cassidy was not honorable is maintaining confidence relative to Bill’s safety!
“Right before the third interview, I was advised not to do the interview as it was discovered that Kerry was going to use it as an opportunity to attempt to get me to violate my confidentiality agreement giving the military a firm legal ground to arrest me on. It was after the third interview that I informed Kerry that I possessed critical information about who was leaking information about me. What everyone has witnessed since that time is her reaction that I possessed the truth.” (Emphasis added—again, see my article: Shootout At the Camelot Corral-Part 2: Mental Hate Crime, which details Cassidy’s response.
Recall what I wrote above about MIND CONTROL: coercive persuasion, mind abuse, thought control, or thought reform—those terms are key to understanding the subtle, and not so subtle manipulations that weave through the various narratives of Kerry Cassidy’s workings. Also recall that back in December, I went after Richard C. Hoagland about his attacks on Gary Legierre, a/k/a “Gary The Mad Martian”…and Kerry’s incredibly cruel statements about Gary on her blog at Camelot—comments unsolicited, and outside the scope of interest (except personal) of Camelot at the time. Remember this…it plays into the next level of lifting the veil on Project Camelot:
“Let me now lay out the evidence as I see it so that others may take a look and make their own determinations. First of all, there was talk of a person named John Jack Burns and he being someone that led to the changes at Camelot between Bill and Kerry.”
in the PDF, Bill shows us “Jack” Burns’ Facebook page which, as Bill points out that “…that NASA appears prominently in the category of interests.” Kerry Cassidy is listed as a long time “friend” (in the Facebook sense) to Jack Burns. But more intriguingly, Bill pulls yet another “thread” that bears noticing:
“So let’s see if we can connect some dots. The following is a link to a NASA Astronaut named Christopher J. Cassidy.
I will point out that he was a former navy SEAL and possesses the same last name as Kerry. Quarky. Also it seems that both Kerry and Jack Burns possess some possible link to NASA as well as the Navy SEALs.” (I will add here that the relationship between Kerry and Cmdr. Christopher Cassidy is, at best tenuous, at this point—perhaps the coincidence of a common surname?)
Follow The Money?
Finally, of interest to the subject, Bill points to another interesting aspect of Project Camelot that goes relatively unexamined:
I also made a sizable donation to Project Camelot after the third interview for the donations that I received from my one dollar campaign and I let some of my ‘friends’ follow the money. Im not going to state any conclusions here but I do feel able to point out some obvious points to everyone. Project Camelot has not been maintaining its viewership as it once had.
Evidence of that can be seen on the view counters of the interview that have been coming out for the last year on Youtube. It is obvious that my interviews havebeen very good for her business and I would assume that I was not the only person to make a sizable donation to her recently. I will also point out that Kerry has announced that she is redesigning her website and that the ‘articles’ tab has disappeared from her site. I would like to be the first to congratulate her getting funds to redesign her site and I appreciate that the hateful article that she posted on her site about me has been removed.
Tying Some Loose Ends Together
Long before the Bill Wood interviews were ever aired, I had begun digging into the connections between Project Camelot and, specifically, NASA. Recall, that Kerry has long been a prominent supporter of Richard C. Hoagland. Even when Hoagland was talking ludicrous, incredible things about Elenin and then YU-55, Cassidy was avidly championing Hoagland on Camelot video interviews, and spotlighting him at the September, 2011 “Awake and Aware Conference”.
Recall, also, that while Hoagland appears to dish on NASA, I am not the first person to question his status as “Ex-NASA” (see “The Cult of NASA and the Hoagland Factor”). In fact, it has been stated on several occassions that it appears Hoagland serves as a sort of “misdirect” foil for NASA, by creating web memes to throw off the trail via clever meme fabrications (a/k/a “The Face On Mars”)—obscuring more critcal information by cleverly focusing on one thing…while averting any notice of the REAL thing. This goes, as well, to the core of the disagreement between former Project Pegasus member, Andrew Basiago and Hoagland (see Project Pegasus and Life On Mars with Andrew Basiago)…Hoagland creates a diversion from the point that Mars has indigenous humanoid life.
In his article, “Do the Owls want to shut down Richard C. Hoagland?” (January 2004), John C. Haich presented the case that Richard Hoagland was, and still is, connected to NASA and to the Center for Security Policy, headed by Neo-Con, Frank Gaffney. So much for being this maverick agency critic!
Hoagland is also fond of citing his work with Walter Cronkite on the coverage for CBS of the Apollo Program. Given the understanding that the Apollo program was scripted (Apollo 11, notably) for public consumption to mask the presence of teams already on not just the Moon, but Mars (again, see Andrew Basiago’s revelations and his quote from his challenge to Hoagland where he states:
“Kerry Cassidy of Project Camelot has informed me that you are part of a faction − one that includes Clark McClelland − that has known that Mars is inhabited but has kept this information secret so that it might be disclosed at a later time.”)
It is long held that “Uncle Walter” was, in fact, a CIA operative (see “Walter Cronkite and the CIA”). Was Richard Hoagland’s career built on his service to intelligence agency media disinformation?
Where does Richard Hoagland intersect with Project Camelot? Given that the history of Project Camelot has been “sanitized”—some early videos apparently removed from the web—and we know only what the “official” bios have told us about the inception of the project; we have to fill in the dots as best we can. One interesting piece of history comes from David Wilcock via his website bio:
Some time around 2003:
“David was also tasked by Richard C. Hoagland to upgrade his interplanetary climate change research to a whole new level, and this necessitated a relieving end to the basement labor by the beginning of April. Up until the Hoagland initiative, David had relied heavily on the work of Russian Dr. Aleskey Dmitriev’s studies to argue that our entire solar system was rapidly becoming brighter, hotter and more energetic. Hoagland insisted that all Russian data needed to be thrown out for the purposes of skeptical Western scientists, and every point needed to be argued from a direct NASA study.
David generated well over a foot of new Internet research books in just a few months as a result of this inspiration, which led to the 2004 “Interplanetary Day After Tomorrow?” article series on Richard’s website, enterprisemission.com, and an appearance on the Art Bell show with Richard, followed by an appearance at the Bay Area UFO Expo later that same year.”
We also learn of the fortunate connections David Wilcock made at a Hoagland conference in 2005:
David first met Billy Blake in February 2005 after a conference at a Science of Mind center in Pasadena on Valentine’s Day. The contacts David made at the Hoagland conference, particularly through Robert Perala, led to this opportunity. Billy was awed by David’s presentation and said that if it were turned into a film, it would be incredible. Thus, the CONVERGENCE film project was born – the realization of the gold-medal prophecy.
So, we can connect Richard Hoagland to David Wilcock as early as 2004. In 2005, Wilcock is moving into Hollywood circles…2006 is around the time Cassidy and Ryan form their partnership. . So here we can only speculate: could the “convergences” which produced the cozy relationships between Camelot, Richard Hoagland and David Wilcock have been forged in a manner designed to create an intel-style “pressure valve” for the burgeoning internet interest into conspiracy theory? We will hold David Wilcock to the side on this…for now, but there are clear linkages between Cassidy and Hoagland that seem to be beyond the normal “business” of Whistleblowers and disclosure.
Given Hoagland’s past work, and the linkages between major media outlets (CBS), NASA, and Frank Gaffney, an apologist for the right wing war policies of the Bush administration in Iraq (Gaffney on Hard Ball with Chris Matthews stated: ” (“…The threat we did know about was the chemical capability that Saddam Hussein had used against his own people. The potential for biological agents were real there was evidence that there was an ongoing nuclear program… The danger was inaction could have resulted in the death[s] of a great many more Americans than 4,000 and that’s the reason I’m still delighted that we did what we did.”), can we not see a valid pattern for exploiting the deep underground culture of the emerging web and the interest in “alternative media”?
Given the connections between Cassidy (Bill Ryan is no longer a viable element of Project Camelot), Richard Hoagland, tangentially, David Wilcock, and more importantly, Jack Burns, we now have a few more pieces of a puzzle…is this a “project” that has been played by “them”…knowingly, or unknowingly, by the principles? Is the whole “alternative media” merely window dressing for a honeypot operation that pulls in viewers to splinter perceptions? Did Project Camelot simply go “off the rails” with the departure of Bill Ryan (and the insertion of Jack Burns)? Or is it simply a victim of the big, beautiful media messs that is the internet in 2012?