NASA Senior Scientist Threatens Cold Fusion Advocate James Martinez

NASA Senior Scientist Threatens Cold Fusion Advocate James Martinez

Lest anyone forget: the road to alternative and free energy is littered with bodies, including Cold Fusion researcher and proponent, Eugene Mallove, whose 1989 book, “Fire From Ice”, documented the suppression of the successful “table top cold fusion” experiments by Fleischmann and Pons. Still suspect, as well, were the circumstances around the demise of Stanley Meyer, who developed 9 patents for a water fuel cell in 1990; and the claims by Lieutenant Colonel U.S. Army (Ret.) Thomas Bearden, over claims of suppression by government agencies and corporate interest.

Real simply: Alternative/free energy is a dangerous game.

The disclosure by James Martinez of a very specific threat by Dennis Bushnell, NASA Chief Scientist atNASA Senior Scientist, Dennis Bushnell  the Langley Research Center, is the sobering warning to the present generation of developers and researchers that forces within the establishment do not want cold fusion, and other alternative energy technologies released to the public. 

The following article was posted by Sterling Allan, the CEO and founder of Pure Energy Systems, Inc. and the New Energy Congress, and it details the facts behind a chilling conspiracy and one of its operatives. I spoke with Mr. Martinez from his home in Los Angeles on Friday evening, November 16 about the details of this report. Mr. Martinez will issue any additional statements about the events in this article at his website, coldfusionnow.org


James Marinez has previously appeared on OffPlanet Radio:

 


NASA Senior Scientist, Dennis Bushnell threatens James Martinez

YouTube Video

In preparation for the Global Breakthrough Energy conference in Holland, Martinez contacted Bushnell about speaking at the conference. Apparently pushing a button, Martinez instead received a tirade, including a threat of repercussions from Navy Seals.

By Sterling D. Allan 
Pure Energy Systems News

James Martinez made a shocking disclosure at the Global Breakthrough Energy Conferencein Hilversum, Holland, on November 11, 2012.

I knew what was coming because he had primed me for it earlier with some hints. So I had my camera out and shot a video of his statement when he made it during his scheduled lecture at the conference.

James lives in Los Angeles where he has many friends and associates in the world of Hollywood. His bio at http://globalbem.com/conference/speakers/ reads:

A media ecologist by trade, James Martinez has been spreading the word about the benefits of Cold Fusion, which he describes as man’s greatest invention since the wheel. Coming soon he will be appearing in the film “The Believers”, discussing the ramifications of Cold Fusion and the technological effects that face the world. Mr. Martinez aims to wake the public up from the deep electronic, hypnotic sleep where he believes most of America resides.

Martinez said that in preparation for the conference, he was seeking to find a high-profile, credible scientist to speak about LENR (Low Energy Nuclear Reactions, colloquially referred to as “cold fusion”). Someone had recommended Dennis Bushnell, Senior Scientist at NASA, who has given various presentations on LENR.

So he called Dr. Bushnell.

Apparently, in the course of the conversation, James said something that set Bushnell off, pushing a button, so to speak, and Bushnell launched into a tirade about how “dangerous” cold fusion is, and that James should do something else. When James reminded Bushnell that driving the streets of LA is pretty dangerous too, but that doesn’t stop him, Bushnell then said something about there being Seal teams on the East and West Coasts, as if to threaten him that if he didn’t comply and stand down, that there could be consequences.

Well, James isn’t that kind of person, one to be threatened and just remain silent.

Here’s the video of Martinez’ report.

 

On November 13, 2012, I phoned Bushnell on a recorded line (disclosed), to get his response, and he said the allegation was “crap.”

I asked Martinez what he thought of Bushnell’s response, to which he responded:

“It’s a lie. He knows the call is being recorded and he probably doesn’t want to confess anything. I don’t care either way. I’ll deal with it later. He’s shown his colors. End of story. I recall quite well…. Thanks for all you do.”

My Experience with Bushnell

While talking about Bushnell, I should share my personal experience with him when I met him at the Conference on Future Energy (COFE) in D.C. in 2006. Here was a high-ranking guy from NASA, so I asked him what he thought about UFOs. This was a one-on-one conversation at an outside-the-box conference, and I was kind of hoping he would say something like, “Officially, NASA doesn’t endorse this, but it is clearly obvious that we have visitors.”

But instead, he said something to the effect: “There is no way you can travel through space because of [cosmic ray] radiation.” 

To which I replied, “Surely an advanced civilization could come up with ways to shield against that.” 

But he tersely responded: “You can’t shield against it.”

I found that very lame, and lacking in imagination at best; but for someone as smart, informed, and connected as he is, he struck me as a cover-up agent, spouting a lie in support of a particular meme that NASA has turned into: namely giving the appearance of pushing the frontiers of space, while simultaneously denying the whole UFO/extraterrestrial thing; when in reality, the black budget projects, for which they are covering up, have had advanced flight technologies for decades.

My experience with Bushnell was consistent with the account that James gave at the conference. 

One other thing about this exchange that is troubling is that Bushnell specified the “Seals” as being agents at their behest to carry out such bully tactics.

I have a hard time believing that Constitution-loving Seals would have any involvement in such things, unless they were given some lie about their intended victim. I’ll tell you one thing: I couldn’t fathom serving in the U.S. military at this time in history, when the US has become more about empire than freedom. I wish some of those who have sworn to defend the Constitution against all enemies, foreign AND domestic, would do more to clean house than to follow orders by corrupt administrators.

Other Developments

Also in his presentation, Martinez said that his present focus is to bring funding to cold fusion technologies. When I was having breakfast with him on November 10, Martinez said he was tired of all the talk and wanted to see action.

Kerry Cassidy on Drake and “The Plan”

Related: 
Drake Interview-04-26-2012-from Freedom Reigns BlogTalk Radio , The “Drake” States Sovereignty Documents Posted, See: Drake-All links

Always one to be convinced that she delivers the definitive “take” on events outside her control…Kerry Cassidy weighed in on Drake and “The Plan”. Cassidy, who is considered by some to be one of the more thorough researchers on the net, when in fact, has a very narrow focus based on her own (or those of her own “cartel’s”) agenda and worldview. In the audio clip below, and her subsequent blog post, she thoroughly spins the entire Drake interview into a few concise nuggets gleaned from her out-of-focus, ripped from context manner. It would also appear that Cassidy and David Wilcock have seperated paths…at least as far as Drake is concerned.

An excerpt from the April 9, 2012 Kerry Cassidy interview with Maxine Taylor at http://awakentothetruth.com/

Kerry’s blog post from April 13 or 14 (hard to tell as there are no date stamps):

THE REVOLUTION WILL NOT BE TELEVISED – Updated

Keep this in mind when Drake tells you to stay home and turn on your TV and wait for further “instructions”….
click here for the Gil Scott Heron rendition of his poem-song “The Revolution Will Not Be Televised”.  He was the originator of the phrase.  Now given that the references are dated and this is not just for ‘black people’ but for all people this time around… It is a revolution of consciousness.
Why do I say that for those not understanding what “The Revolution Will Not Be Televised” MEANS… it means it will be LIVE and it will not be something “handled” by the men with guns on your behalf.  To bring this concept up to the present day … the point is if you want change you must first change yourself and then take action.  
What I object to in Drake’s original interview with David Wilcock is the paternalistic tone and telling people to lock their doors stay inside and turn on their TV and wait for further instructions and re-education.    
This is a revolution by and for the people and must be orchestrated from within.  It will not happen on one day and it will not be sold to you along with conventional media spin or products to get you through the night.  It will require you to turn on, tune in and take part.  

THE REVOLUTION WILL NOT BE TELEVISED – UpdatedKeep this in mind when Drake tells you to stay home and turn on your TV and wait for further “instructions”….
click here for the Gil Scott Heron rendition of his poem-song “The Revolution Will Not Be Televised”.  He was the originator of the phrase.  Now given that the references are dated and this is not just for ‘black people’ but for all people this time around… It is a revolution of consciousness.Why do I say that for those not understanding what “The Revolution Will Not Be Televised” MEANS… it means it will be LIVE and it will not be something “handled” by the men with guns on your behalf.  To bring this concept up to the present day … the point is if you want change you must first change yourself and then take action.  What I object to in Drake’s original interview with David Wilcock is the paternalistic tone and telling people to lock their doors stay inside and turn on their TV and wait for further instructions and re-education.    
This is a revolution by and for the people and must be orchestrated from within.  It will not happen on one day and it will not be sold to you along with conventional media spin or products to get you through the night.  It will require you to turn on, tune in and take part.  

 

I did not have time to review this clip prior to my Drake interview, but had read her blog post. People who listen carefully to the interview, and to Drake’s replies will have many of the “issues” raised by Cassidy answered. Here are a few points of difference worth addressing:

  • Cassidy asserts that the plan as outlined by Drake “is in all intents and purposes a coup..”
  • A big push right now…a huge desire to paint a picture…that we are going into a golden age…putting on blinders…they can then make that happen.” She terms this an “Illuminati philosophy”. She then blathers on about creators and announces that creation “without a spirit is dead…robotic…a Project Blue Beam kinda thing..and you can be taken over.”
  • She also talks about knowing Drake and his group, and where he comes from..”what is it their intentions really are when they talk about sitting in your home and just allowing this changing of the guard to occur…a paternalistic approach.”
  • Cassidy intones a “revolution in consciousness” and an energy shift…
  • She then goes to the remarks made by Drake and Wilcock about “killing off the perpetrators of the NWO”…”vengence and blood” and “the Illuminati track”.

Answering Cassidy’s points:

  • From a strictly linguistic view, “The Plan” is, in fact, a coup which, according to Merriam-Webster’s Dictionary, is a “OVERTURN, an UPSET”. What Cassidy infers is that a coup is necessarily violent in nature (coup de grace) or an insurrection (coup d’etat) that overturns a LEGITIMATE authority. Rhetorically, she twists the word to fit her particular bias, and inserts a negative context. The following points negate and refute Cassidy’s statement:

     Based upon Drake’s original interview with David Wilcock (transcript here),in the subsequent interviews (posted here), and in the latest interview which I conducted, it is very clear that the initiation of this process is derived from a lawful, peaceful process which re-aserts the original foundations of the United States (not UNITED STATES)via the founding documents. 

    That present and former military operatives, inside the Pentagon, as well as insiders in the government, intelligence agencies, financial, and legal institutions, who are of a higher moral conscience, have long felt that the nation had gone terminally rougue from its founding principles; and that plans have been in formation for decades to eventually move against the military-industrial-intellignece-banking-corporate cartel that had take power over the U.S. and the globe; demonstrates an internal expression of the national will to retain a free, accountable, and transparent government, based on founding principles.

    That the legitimate military officers, non-commissioned, and enlisted troops operate under the authority of their oaths, the UCMJ, and the procedures outlined in the Armed Services Field Manuals; and that defending the nation against “enemies foreign and domestic”, is a prime directive. The military,in this capacity, therefore operates under a de jure mandate that is neither martial law or insurrection; nor does it violate the Posse Comitatus Act of 1807. 

    Terming “The Plan”, outlined by Drake, as a “coup”, is based on Cassidy’s biased speculation, and is a statement of sheer sophistry; an out-of-context distortion of the intents, as outlined repeaterdly (listen to Drake’s 03-17-2012, “Address To The Troops“). Such inference by Cassidy, simply lends false credibility to the fiction of legitimacy perpetrated by the present cabal-led faction of foreign bankers and murderers who wreak mayhem over the planet. You need to ask: WHO does Kerry Cassidy REALLY speak for?

  • While Drake communicates the desire for an orderly series of events to occur, and is optimistic that The Plan can be accomplished with minimal interruption, no thinking person can believe this process will be painless or without pitfalls under the best circumstances. The men and women behind the scenes are VERY cognizant of the serious nature of the proceedings, and are grounded in a sober respect for the spiritual roots of such actions.

    Drake has repeatedly outlined steps that can be taken by EVERYONE to help assure a peaceful transition, and he has also stated that people MUST be proactive, involved, vigilant, and ready to withstand temporary (not defined) hardships. While he may be a bit “homey” in his narrative, he is also grounded in the realism of a boots-on-the-ground soldier who has experienced the horrors of war. Again, we advise actually READING/LISTENING…IN CONTEXT…the full outline. ANd also THINKING TROUGH what may be involved in a perilous undertaking! 

    The “Illuminati philosophy” is, was, and always will be an INVERSION of true spirtual principles—even the term, “illumined” is a dark appropriation of genuine spiritual truths. Used, as it is, in the context of Cassidy’s narrative in the audio, it is simply another device to distort the intent and moral character of the people behind “The Plan”. As usual with Kerry, she injects buzz words and dangles dark phrases like “Blue Beam” to instill the fear memes she has spent years spinning and looping out into the infosphere. Her assertion that “without a spirit” (this) would be a “dead creation” is likewise more of her rhetorical twisting of what is actually outlined.

  • IF Kerry actually “knows the people behind this movement”, as she states: WHY ARE THEY NOT TALKING TO HER? Certainly, Project Camelot still has significant enough page view numbers (for now…) to make it one of the more desirable places to air an honest interview with Drake…she may tell you she is not interested…or is it the opposite? What does that infer?

    She further implies that “Drake and his group” are a mechanism to ensnare, blind, and “take away the power” of the people of the U.S.—she is very deft at the veiled inferences…but, herself steadfastly resists giving up her own positions on where SHE stands. Drake has outlined (again) positive actions that the people will need to initiate through the process. He is circumspect in cautioning agaisnt ENGAGING any military, but also adamant that the military WILL act in accordance with their field manuals regarding the civilian population. 

    It is, admittedly, one of the more “dicey” issues involved in this undertaking, that: both the military are acting lawfully, AND that the populace are properly informed about the action—and it is of genuine concern. But using fear imagery and veiled assaults on the honor of those involves does not serve the legitimate issues in such a grave endeavor. (Addressed as well in my interview)

  • Fixing on a single (again out-of-context) statement made by Drake and re-fashioning it as: “sitting in your home and just allowing this changing of the guard to occur…” is a classic tar baby wielded by Cassidy to infer that a passive stance is being promoted by Drake et al,  and is is a nearly complete fabrication. Passivity and blind obedience to authority is the opposite spirit of the one outlined by Drake in all of presentations.
  • The “revolution in consciousness” and an energy shift…” cited by Cassidy (in her rambling narrative)IS the issue at hand! Again…this has been addressed by MANY, including David Wilcock, Ben Fulford, as well asJames Martinez (in two interviews here )and nearly all of my guests. It is THE guiding principle behind the TIMING of this execution, which has been in formation for over a decade. While vortexes and tunneling energy waves are all very cool, consciousness change manifests in the WILL and DESIRE of people to change…the interest in what Drake has talked about is significant enough to warrant being a “game changer”.
  • Regarding the statements made about “..killing off the perpetrators of the NWO”“vengence and blood”…Drake has made concise philosophical remarks that must be taken fully in the CONTEXT (big, big requirement) of possible scenarios”: 

    It is David Wilcock who states: “If someone has done massive, massive harm to others — and that includes torturing people, killing people in large numbers, doing it with a sadistic glee and with people who are innocent — then we, as a society, do have the right to issue a death penalty.”(from MASS ARRESTS: David Interviews Drake — Transcript!)

    It is also fair to state that Drake does insert his own values into his talks…as does David Wilcock, and many others in the dialog about this plan. The public discussion is going RIGHT NOW!, on YouTube, websites, blogs, and radio shows. It is total hyperbole to fashion Drake, and the people behind “The Plan” as mindless agents of vendetta, and it was David Wilcock who noted this in the interview by stating:

“I think that people have a right to a trial by jury. I think that doing a bunch of shooting at the beginning is a terrible mistake. It makes us no better than the people that we’re attempting to supersede.” 
 

Kerry Cassidy is NOT part of this discussion. In her present role she is little more than agent provocatuer in service to her own personal and media bias, and employs distortion where a level, journalistic tone would better serve. Shading the process of a people trying to organize a liberation effort as “the Illuminati track” should tell us all we need to know about Kerry Cassidy’s integrity in presenting facts—AND give clues as to where  she actually does stand in any proactive movements that convey a true “consciousness shift”. 

Anyone who reads this blog knows that I have tried to balance my skepticism of “The Plan” with an intent to check out facts and intention; and corellate data from both the inside, and external indicators of what can be callled a “movement” in formation. Humanity is both tragically flawed, and ingenously resilliant, and any movement is fraught with peril.

Besides restoring the United States to a LAWFUL government, consider: disclosure of all “black projects”, suppressed technologies, Satanic Ritual Abuse cults, pedophile rings, and the massive financial plunder—worldwide–as well as the disclosure and end to the MKUltra-style mind control programs, sexual rings, and Blackwater-type mercenaries that have tarnished the U.S. military’s image! 

Being a media “drama queen” for her own brand of exotic, mystical mumbo jumbo and para-politcs is Kerry Cassidy’s specialty…not assessing the merits of a serious discussion of a framework that has potential to end the tragic cycles of war, death, and poverty which have inflicted for millenia upon mankind. Our odds are narrow. We need truth and deep introspection…not more hubristic, shallow opinions from a non-journalist.

(Aside: I have been privy to the INTERNATIONAL media interest in interviewing Drake, and of other nations who are seeking help for similar efforts—GLOBALLY. Drake is about to penetrate more mainstream media venues in the very near term. It is apparent that this movement has some real “legs“…more on that soon)

 

 

 

The Believers-2012 The Year of Cold Fusion

The Believers-2012 The Year of Cold Fusion

 

Forbes: 2012 “The Year of Cold Fusion?”

From Clayton Brown and Monica Long Ross of 137 Films: the story of those who believed in Cold Fusion, well worth supporting!

The topic is heating up!  Forbes’s article wonders if 2012 will be the year of Cold Fusion. Our timing withThe Believers couldn’t be better. 

The Believers begins in March of 1989, when two respected chemists from the University of Utah stand in front of a wall of reporters; flashbulbs pop as the pair — one shy, the other cracking jokes— announce a startling claim: they have solved the world’s energy problems using seawater, batteries, and the mysterious glass contraption they hold proudly in their hands. “Cold Fusion” is born. Within days, Stanley Pons and Martin Fleischmann are on the cover of Time Magazine. But in three short months, their careers are in tatters, their reputations ruined, and Cold Fusion is synonymous with “bad science.” 

Twenty-two years later, despite mainstream science’s continued disdain, professional and amateur scientists, a high school whiz kid, and a Hollywood-based internet DJ are confident that Cold Fusion can still save the world, and that we are closer than ever to the Holy Grail of civilization. They’re the Believers. 

Hear James Martinez on Cold Fusion Radio: 
Monica Long Ross and Clayton Brown; Directors “The Believers” from 137Films
 on the February 22, 2012 Ca$h Flow