In my previous article I passingly referred to the JFK shooting as being the prima materia for the modern era of media media mass trauma events (events staged, or optimized for maximum public consumption and with an alternative “spin factor”). I also mentioned 9-11 as bearing signatures of an overt conspiracy, and have often cited the stories about the five Israelis arrested at Battery Park under suspicion after police found damning evidence that could connect them to terrorist activities related to the World Trade Center disaster (all the stories and evidence are posted at: whatreallyhappened.com).
The best tenets of investigation always point to MOTIVE. Yet, the Sandy Hook shootings, like nearly all high profile mass public events, veer toward the shadowy sub-psychology of a single targeted individual—all the while ignoring the glaring facts that stand on the periphery. The patterns are all in view to examine, but the media does work on the principle of the repeated lie, from the lips of toadie “public officials”. The memory hole is a bottomless pit.
I will note the direct citation in the Duff article referring to the iconic slaughter. A term I have used in previous reporting on the Aurora, CO Batman Theater massacre. “Iconic” is a key term to understanding the subliminal embeds in all such events.
the Los Angeles Times report citing NO ASSAULT RIFLE WAS USED :
”Clad in military fatigues and carrying two semiautomatic pistols, he entered the school, argued with someone in the hallway and then opened fire on staff members and children around 9:30 a.m., a law enforcement source said. He focused his gunfire on two rooms. Children huddled in closets and corners as the carnage unfolded.”
Days later, the Sandy Hook Massacre, the iconic slaughter of twenty small children, is now looking like a terrorist attack, not a “murder suicide.” Was “lone gunman” Adam Lanza a “patsy,” the same word Lee Harvey Oswald used to describe himself before being “silenced” in November 1963?
Today, Michael Harris, former Republican candidate for governor of Arizona and GOP campaign finance chairman, in an internationally televised news broadcast, cited “Israeli revenge” in, what he called, “the terrorist attack in Connecticut.”
Harris cited Israeli “rage” against the US and against President Barack Obama. By “Israel,” we mean “Netanyahu.”
he mission was to teach America a lesson, knowing that “America would take the punishment, keep “quiet,” and let a ‘fall guy’ take the blame.”
A “fall guy” is another word for “patsy.”
Harris, citing the flood of inconsistencies in the “cover story,” pointed out the following, “The facts are now becoming obvious. This is another case where Israel has chosen violence and terrorism where their bullying in Washington has failed. Israel believes the US “threw them under the bus,” particularly after the recent Gaza war, allowing Israel to be humiliated in the United Nations.
Their response was to stage a terror attack, targeting America in the most hideous and brutal way possible, in fact, an Israeli “signature attack,” one that butchers children, one reminiscent of the attacks that killed so many children in Gaza?”
Washington is terrified of Israel, their powerful lobby and its relationship with organized crime. Now, a key former Senator, Chuck Hagel, who has helped expose this fact, is likely to be nominated as the secretary of defense, despite vocal protests from Israel.
During his interview today, Mike Harris explained his rationale for looking to Israel as responsible for Sandy Hook, saying:
“This is exactly what Israel did in Norway; the political party that voted sanctions against Israel was retaliated against by a “lone gunman” who killed 77 children.
This is what Israel always does, they go after the children. It is what they do in Gaza every day. It is what was done in Norway. It is what happened at Sandy Hook. Nobody buys the “lone gunman” story anymore, not with the Gabby Giffords’ shooting, not with the Aurora “Batman” shooting, certainly not with Breveik, and certainly not in Connecticut.”
Today, Israeli News gave further credence to Harris’ analysis when they issued the following statements regarding the probable nomination of Hegel:
“Chuck Hagel’s statements and actions regarding Israel have raised serious concerns for many Americans who care about Israel,” said the Republican Jewish Coalition (RJC) Executive Director, Matt Brooks. “The Jewish community and every American who supports a strong US-Israel relationship have cause for alarm if the president taps Hagel for such an important post.”
After Harris’ broadcast, key members of the military and law enforcement community contacted Veterans Today in full support of Harris’ analysis.
One three star general is quoted as saying,
“Harris hit the nail right on the head and it is about time someone spoke up.”
Is Harris right? Would Israel order the deaths of twenty tiny children to make a political point? Have they done this before?
Is Harris right about that too?
Moments ago, Harris phoned me. I asked him if, hours later, he was still willing to back up his statements.
His answer was simple:
“You murder children as part of ‘business as usual,’ you shouldn’t be surprised that when children are murdered, people look to you.”