The Global Economic Opera: Hypnosis

The Global Economic Opera: Hypnosis

The story below is what now passes for “NEWS/INTEL” on the web. Do you believe it? Do you WANT to believe it?

Marshall McLuhan stated:
“The method of the twentieth century is to use not single but multiple models for for experimental exploration-the technique of suspended judgment.” (The Gutenberg Galaxy, pg. 71)
Consumers of media in the post-digital culture continually combat, to the point of fatigue, the torrents of biased viewpoints; even those of the absurdist bent, which by sheer volume distort the perceptual will. We are repeatedly subjected to elevated levels of hyperbole, irrational scenarios, and streams of non-sequitur. Images of words, cut-and-pasted, repeated, remixed, looped, and mashed-up in endless nuanced rethreads.
The attribution is dead. rumors are fact; the de facto meme is sovereign…the culture acidwashed by blips that coarse in nanoseconds…the screen flash, the lost search engine; “real lies”—the currency by which traders of the missing asterisk sustain their legerdemain. 
Responsible journalism was a gleam in its mother’s eye before the abortion. “Controlled media” may be the inference, but it is merely the epithet spoken by those who traffic in a more subtle form of Jedi Mind Trick: the missing contextual inference of the “we” who speaks with knowing authority. Subliminal gang-stalking is the new methodology. Shadowy sources, half-spoken (written) references; the profiles of the social net—virtual egos that shift and recast themselves against an endless strobing backdrop.
Not so much “suspended judgment”, as an aerial wire act of shifting, ever-changing perceptions. “Real” today is tomorrow’s discarded opinion. The hidden consensus pushes against the mind’s eye in rapid scans of the ever-deepening confluence. Surreal is the new real. No one needs to prove anything now…it all floats like a smoke ring until it dissolves into—”multiple models for for experimental exploration”visual awareness is the new courier of collective consciousness.
McLuhan advanced that  if all aspects of our common reality were distilled into a single sensory gate “we shall have a distortion that is scientific because (it is) consisten and coherent…the dominance of one sense is the formula for hypnosis (The Gutenberg Galaxy, ppg. 72-73)
The ongoing Global Economic Opera is a marvel of abstracted multimedia mojo (multimedia=multiple senses streaming as ONE sense). No one offers proof, the private disclosure is “coin of the realm”; credibility hinges, now, on the ability to flip info into newer and more elevated forms; “reality TV” streams 24/7…THIS is the HYPNOSIS:
Thursday, March 1, 2012INTEL ON ARRESTS – GATES, GEITHNER, KISSINGER — MUST READ This is one of those Rare “FASTEN YOUR SEATBELTS” Intel reports. I received permission from higher ups to post this as You All Need To Know. According to several high level and down the rabbit hole sources, this was relayed to me.These are rumors and yet to be verified. Use discernment.Geithner, our ‘in-trouble ‘Fed Treasury boy was detained and is now under protective custody. In the questioning process, he revealed all the alleged attempted thefts of George Bush Sr. related to the Global Settlements and PP distributions.George Bush Sr. under questioning revealed that Bill Gates’s team was responsible for the software controlled hacking of the accounts. Over 40 trap doors were discovered that directed stolen funds to be deposited in offshore accounts of Bush Sr, Obama and others. These have been found and plugged by the White Knights Computer Experts with Galactic Assistance.Bill Gates was flown to China for a nasty confrontation on the matter. It is alleged that Bill Gates is now under arrest & protective custody. He is alleged being charged with over 30 counts of treason. It also alleged that Bill Gates was the one delaying the RV as he had control of the red button which interfered with the processing.It is also alleged that Henry Kissinger is under arrest as well as many of the Dark Cabal Families.The Dark Cabal Rats are panicky and turning on each others. They are threatening to kill each other and that is one reason they are under protective custody.As always this intel is written on jello and may change anytime.Thank You White Knights, Thank You Galactics, Thank You LORD
Look closely at the semantics here because it is the mechanism of the visual awareness: “higher ups” give permission for this breathless gush (block-style, no paragraphs, run-on narrative) of non-info to be posted; White Knight Computer Experts (with Galactic Assistance, no less) vs. Microsoft/Gates in plugging financial software backdoors…OH! By the way, Kissinger was arrested (which one, maybe the clone Kissinger)…homicidal imbred elites gunning for each other…and WTF is the “red button”?  Of course, if you ASK…YOU do not “know” (wink, wink).
So how many Galctic Councils does it take to bring down the cabal? Five. But it’s an imaginary number. Dratzo! indeed.

7 Comments

  1. I think you should go out and take a walk for a half hour or so.

    What we should keep in mind is that relatively few people are even aware of these stories, and even fewer believe them.

    Though these sites, certain videos, and certain recycled articles may get a lot of "hits," I don't think most of the content is being readily accepted.

    Now, here's a concept borrowed from my training: People will go into communication, or show interest, at their level of agreement or reality, which is reflected by their most chronic emotional tone.

    So one way to look at the situation is this: There are simply not that many high-toned people on the planet right now who are willing to take optimistic ideas seriously. Therefore, such ideas are relatively easy to discredit. Conservative ideas are much more difficult to discredit, because a lot of people operate at this tone level, at least socially. A lower harmonic of conservatism is fear, so fearful messages tend to be rather well accepted. There are also a lot of people who, while they put on a good face, are really basically hopeless. So hopeless messages tend to be accepted, too.

    Anger is a no-no band for most people, as is belligerence. In many places you can get your ass arrested just by being angry or bellicose to the wrong person. Fighting is often a last attempt to stay sane. Thus people who have to fight or struggle to survive often don't do too bad, but their messages may be overlooked or frowned upon by most others. Those who are merely angry think fighting is the only answer. They make decent generals but aren't very sane. These days, too many of such people are in politics. They are up-tone enough to get angry, but this is frowned upon. A safer place to operate from in such situations is covert hostility, the tone level of the professional criminal.

    And so, angry men often end up serving criminals. And war and fighting are glorified in movies and video games, though usually downplayed a bit in the news in exchange for outright lying about it all.

    Tone level is a useful way to analyze the messages that come to us, and the public response. Back-biting, rumors and intrigue are hip these days, so there's a lot of it out there. The saner ones ignore it or discount it, so this generated chatter also reflects the tone level of the crowd attracted to the internet. If you want to hide out in your room and throw conceptual rocks at people, the internet is the perfect place for you.

    Meanwhile, some of us are just trying to communicate and get data.

    Hey, wouldn't it be nice of the world were sane?

    Reply
  2. "Now, here's a concept borrowed from my training: People will go into communication, or show interest, at their level of agreement or reality, which is reflected by their most chronic emotional tone."

    Larry, why not share with the class the source of your training? Maybe it's time we dealt with the source of a great deal of mass hypnosis. Maybe I am not "clear" enough for you? I do not have a "chronic emotional tone". I possess a wide range of emotional tones that correspond to the appropriate responses—not some flat, robotic state of —ummm! "clear".

    Ignoring viral disinformation campaigns would be willfully ignorant and allow the deceit to continue. I am not neutral…I have a stake in where this current trending takes us in the sphere of consciousness. "Information" is cheap and abundant—discernment is rare and shrinking daily.

    Am I CLEAR?

    Reply
  3. I don't so much look at the emotional "tone" as the level of logic. We can hopefully all move through different tones of our preferred band width based on our mood on the day – I can certainly move anywhere on the bandwidth between cool and logical to hot and logical. I care about the logic. What I am seeing is a lot of illogical ranting. It does not matter whether I respond to that with hot logic or cold logic – my personal mood changes nothing. Illogical ranting is illogical ranting.

    One piece of irrational nonsense that persists in Australia – where young males want to pretend we are American – is that we have FEMA camps here and that there is one on the Gold Coast. As anyone who lives there knows, the man spreading this particular bit of disinformation has deliberately angled his photographs to mislead. As anyone who lives there knows there is a sports stadium and a railway shunting yard – both brand new because this is a brand new, very expensive and elite suburb full of compliant people – definitely not the kind of place anyone would build a detention centre.

    But no level of factual information will cut through the base chakra hysteria of these young males who WANT to believe this rubbish, and when I point out it is disinformation they attack me with an irrational level of vitriol and hatred that far exceeds my crime.

    I also point out that there are some very major and sinister military bases here already being used as detention centres that they might want to investigate. Guess what – they are not interested. They never, and I do mean NEVER, respond with a question as to what I am talking about and what my source of information is. Why? Presumably I don’t fit the mind controlled image of a person who knows something worth communicating. Who knows? Maybe I am lucky that no-one wants to know.

    My personal challenge now is that I have a message the world needs to hear, but it is too simple, and like me, it is boring. It requires a level of personal responsibility by every human being on this planet, it is hard work, it takes time and it has no emotional excitement attached to it whatsoever. I have to work out how to communicate this message through all the mass hysteria, without using the mind manipulation techniques that I personally despise.

    Reply
  4. Any suggestion that our inherently untenable global economic system could or would reform itself strikes me as preposterous. There isn't a planet big or bountiful enough to withstand the insatiable appetite for social advantage which defines our particular version of the human experience. This is a system which relies on planned obsolescence and the toxic corporate mantra of Growth!. Something is very wrong about a paradigm in which scarcity creates "value" – and "value" is seen as Me prevailing over Thee. Losers weepers, indeed.

    There is nothing even remotely sustainable about this economic system. If it wasn't blind, deaf and dumb, it wouldn't even exist. Any notion that it can police itself – or be policed – is a tad unrealistic.

    Admittedly, I'm not well-versed in the arcane pronouncements and prophesies breathlessly peddled in the nooks and crannies of the conspiracy industry. But regardless of who is doing the peddling and why, the narrative themes are as familiar as the five o'clock news of yore, designed to reassure its subscribers everything is going to work out just fine. Sure, any curious snorkeler brave to jump into the sewage and navigate the flotsam and jetsam can catch glimpses of the sprawling, astonishingly horrific socioeconomic landscape out there… but, rest assured, there are good people in high places working on The Problem. Best of all, any resolution – should it come to that – will be mostly, if not entirely, painless for the good and virtuous, who are never be inconvenienced by any niggling indictments which might point to one's own culpability in the collective delusion.

    It's all so ludicrous, it makes The Eschaton – whatever inconceivable form it may take – look like a perfectly reasonable outcome. However one chooses to define it, we are living in a house of cards. How long can humanity outrun Consequence? I have no idea. But to my tired eyes, Consequence seems to be gaining fast.

    Reply
  5. Arvin, do you have any solutions?

    It is my observation that we have become afraid of revealing our true selves to anyone. We fear what they may do with that knowledge so we have stopped sharing the pathways we are taking, experiments we are conducting in how to live, our attempts and failures. If we do we will be psycho-bullied to death by those who know and are doing better than we are.

    Let's use this forum to share our attempts to find solutions that we are surely all making. How are you attempting to manage or reduce your "own culpability in the collective delusion"? What are YOU doing, what are YOU experiencing, what failures have YOU had, what successes have YOU had. And this is a question, not a trap. I really want to hear how others are attempting to solve this.

    Anyone out there, can you share what you are doing?

    Reply
  6. It is my observation that we have become afraid of revealing our true selves to anyone. We fear what they may do with that knowledge so we have stopped sharing the pathways we are taking, experiments we are conducting in how to live, our attempts and failures. If we do we will be psycho-bullied to death by those who know and are doing better than we are.

    There is a lot of truth to that, Christine. The caveat, for me, is that those doing the psycho-bullying are not "doing better [than we are]", but can nonetheless poison the well from which I and everyone else drinks. But, yes, I absolutely feel exposed and vulnerable every time I make a public comment, and this is likewise true of many, if not most, of my email correspondences. My creed: Mind your head. Watch your step. Share what you can. Sounds simple enough, but, in practice, it is a fiber-optic trapeze act with no net. And I have this thing about open heights, which I only brave when motivated by conscience. It doesn't win me a lot of friends, which, as a reclusive person, is something I can tolerate all too easily; however, I don't go looking for enemies to fill my dance card. I can do the old soft-shoe as well as any lying diplomat, but certain lifelong predispositions involving social justice, language and creative expression tend to align against endearing behaviors. I half-jokingly refer to myself as a benevolent misanthrope. An enigmatic tough love cartographer of consciousness with a D.I.Y. Punk ethos – minus the nihilism – and definitely not everyone's cup o'tea.

    Let's use this forum to share our attempts to find solutions that we are surely all making. How are you attempting to manage or reduce your "own culpability in the collective delusion"?

    Excellent question. First, do no harm, is my mitigation dictum. Again, sounds simple, but, in practice, it so isn't. Depending on one's level of honesty and self-awareness, participating in society very often requires choosing between perpetrating this harm or that harm rather than, say, jumping into the upside-down, inside-out, Good vs. Evil cartoon infusing virtually every aspect of popular culture and its myriad subcultures. This is not to say I'm a moral relativist, but that isn't an onion worth peeling at the moment.

    On a practical level, I avoid using my mighty powers of persuasion to cast spells, choosing, instead, to break them left and right – none more so than my own. The financial and social capital is in the casting, not the breaking, and I have sacrificed much to that end, as has my loving and courageous wife of twenty-nine years. I would much prefer being on a remote beach or mountain top watching birds and smelling flowers, but, alas, that is not my mission on this beautiful, heartbreaking planet.

    What are YOU doing, what are YOU experiencing, what failures have YOU had, what successes have YOU had. And this is a question, not a trap. I really want to hear how others are attempting to solve this.

    A lifetime of thinking in terms of solutions, in the global sense, damn near killed me. I survived by building a wall, very deliberately, between the personal and the transpersonal, albeit a low wall I breach (primarily) at will. This should not be interpreted as resignation, but, rather, an acute awareness of my modest sphere of influence predicated on a thorough understanding of my strengths and many weaknesses, along with a wicked grasp of human nature.

    I've spent the last four years on that net-less, fiber-optic trapeze to which I previously referred. More specifically, I've been on a long, arduous, transformational quest to reconcile the cable-snapping tension between being a contactee and living life as a well-adjusted, authentic human being capable of sharing what I've learned with people who want to know. And, Sister, there ain't nothing easy about it. Mostly, I have failed. I am not a channeler, self-promoting huckster or aspiring New Age prophet, and I have had to bust my ass day in and day out since mid-2008 just to keep from falling into The Abyss. For what it's worth – not much to most people, as it turns out – the majority of my experiences, though not all of them, occur while fully conscious, and very few are ambiguous. Having become a contactee before I even knew the word "ufology" was in the dictionary, mine was a rude awakening, as I suspect all Divine awakenings are. A wise woman recently reminded me we are not given more than we can handle – but neither are we given less, and I can handle a great deal.

    I thought politics was rough sport – and, as you can probably surmise, I played it that way – but politics pales next to ufology, a demolition derby on a minefield replete with broken glass, concrete and razor wire. Both are ugly playgrounds for the worst of human nature, but, fortunately, a student willing to bleed for a good education can find one anywhere.

    My interactions with advanced nonhuman intelligence – or, what I call, cosmological intelligence – by contrast, have been in a category of experience far beyond anything I can adequately describe, which is a big part of the problem. This is more than the usual & customary head-scratching WTF! type of close encounter, and I do not refer to myself as a contactee casually. Mine is an extremely challenging story to tell for a number of reasons, not the least being that it requires serving myself up like a freshly cracked oyster to a flock of ravenous, squawking seagulls.

    It would be fair to say this response is a tiny, treacherous step in that direction; one of many I have taken as I inch my way across an unforgiving precipice. Fun times all around.

    Reply
  7. Wow, Arvin, you have me waiting on the next chapter with bated breath. As a direct contactee, one has to assume that you have a job to do.

    Like many, all my skills are subtle, and so I never know myself if they are real until they are in some way enacted. I never know until after the event if I am doing the right thing or have been given something, or if I have just dreamed it up for myself. I get premonitions that I do not know are premonitions until after the event, I walk back in history and find myself in a different times space, I get obsessions to do something or other and have learned to obey them because they are guided, I get intellectual insights with no supporting evidence that are total certainties and so I sound stupidly arrogant until I am proven right; but it is pretty hard tracking yourself by working with your apparent faults rather than what society regards as strengths. I trust myself when I am at my most obsessive, belligerent and arrogant – now try selling that to anyone else! I think it would be so much easier to be a direct contactee and simply be told which way is up.

    Are you willing to share more? I can't say that this is a safe forum – I have seen rather a lot of bloodlust and savagery here, as everywhere else, but maybe it is time we all toughen up and wear our discomforts as a badge of honour rather than allowing them to be a cause for fear.

    It is hard for Americans to understand that the Australian Aboriginals call themselves blacks or black fellas. When we take on the apparent term of abuse and use it ourselves, it loses its sting, and the Aboriginals have that one well worked out. They wear their colour with apparent pride. Americans come here and are appalled at our use of the term "blacks", but we actually have a dictionary of much worse words which you will never have heard of to use if we are being derogatory or racist. When do WE come out of the closet and take all the abuse thrown at us as compliments rather than insults?

    Reply

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>